Scientists examine the ‘evolutionary paradox’ of menopause in mammals like killer whales and humans

February 17, 2016

Scientists are studying why females from a handful of species -- including killer whales -- continue to live well beyond the age when they can bear offspring (AFP Photo/Valery Hache)

Menopause in women and females from a few other “higher” species is probably a fluke of nature rather than evolution at work, according to a study published Wednesday.

Biologists have long puzzled over why women lose the capacity to reproduce during roughly the last third of their lives. . ..

“Menopause is an evolutionary paradox,” said Hazel Nichols, a biologist at Liverpool John Moores University and lead author of the study.

“An early end to reproduction seems contrary to the laws of natural selection, where passing on genes to the next generation is the main purpose of life.”

In most mammals, she pointed out, females reproduce until a ripe old age.

Evolutionary biologists have put forward competing explanations for this extended “post-reproductive lifespan,” or PRLS.

The “grandmother hypothesis” suggests women outlive their fertility in order to help raise grandchildren, thereby strengthening the likelihood that their own genes will survive.

In this scenario, “grandmothers… encouraging their sons to have more children” are driven by a biological imperative, Nichols told AFP.

Even among orcas, scientists have shown that females remain with their male offspring, and probably teach them hunting techniques and where to apply them.

– Evolutionary tinkering –

Another theory says that menopause does not, in fact, confer any advantage in the Darwinian struggle to pass on genes from one generation to the next, but is just an accident resulting in a “mismatch” in the ageing process.

“Different parts of the body are likely to age at different rates, in the same way that some part of a car wear out before others,” Nichols said.

In this argument, modern medicine and nutrition has helped outpace the evolutionary process, extending human life beyond its “natural” limits.

To find out who might be right, Nichols and colleagues examined data from 26 different mammal species, including three tribal or historical human populations. . . .

To finish reading the rest of the article go here


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s